Triple
T156224
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sun |
E3186
|
entity |
| Predicate | futureEvolution |
P7293
|
FINISHED |
| Object | red giant |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: red giant | Statement: [Sun, futureEvolution, red giant]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: futureEvolution Context triple: [Sun, futureEvolution, red giant]
-
A.
designEvolution
Indicates how the design of an entity changes, develops, or is refined over time or across versions.
-
B.
nextEdition
Indicates that one entity is the immediate subsequent edition or version that follows another in a sequence.
-
C.
eve
Indicates a relationship where one entity is the evening or night-time counterpart, phase, or occurrence associated with another entity.
-
D.
envisionedAs
Indicates that one entity is mentally pictured, imagined, or conceived in terms of another entity or role.
-
E.
technologyParadigm
Indicates a relationship where one entity represents or defines the overarching technological model, framework, or approach within which another entity operates or is categorized.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2527757ec819090b8becb2cf1a862 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:27 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a258808ff08190a06b6206f635612b |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:52 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2565ded588190a27319aaa0130b4f |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:43 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a2587e598c81909e1082b813971f48 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:52 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:31 a.m.