Triple
T15493996
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Federal Constitution of 1848 |
E378766
|
entity |
| Predicate | reservedPowersToCantons |
P33411
|
FINISHED |
| Object | residual powers |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: residual powers | Statement: [Federal Constitution of 1848, reservedPowersToCantons, residual powers]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: reservedPowersToCantons Context triple: [Federal Constitution of 1848, reservedPowersToCantons, residual powers]
-
A.
hasAutonomousCanton
Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with a canton that has autonomous or self-governing status.
-
B.
foundingCantons
Indicates that the referenced entities are the original member regions or states that established or founded a larger political or organizational unit.
-
C.
rightsBodyCompetence
Indicates that an entity has the authority or competence to exercise or administer rights within a particular legal or institutional framework.
-
D.
numberOfCantons
Indicates the total count of cantons associated with or contained within a given entity.
-
E.
reservesAuthorityToStatesOver
chosen
Indicates that a higher-level authority explicitly retains or assigns decision-making power on a given matter to individual states rather than exercising it centrally.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85cd53a7c819080f5b9042c4c199e |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e03fad723481908d2aa33e8f065f2f |
completed | April 16, 2026, 1:47 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ded2874b788190999158e0f043be21 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 11:49 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:49 a.m.