Triple

T15244861
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject MIP = NEXP E364352 entity
Predicate equatesComplexityClass P62369 FINISHED
Object class of problems solvable by multi-prover interactive proofs LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: class of problems solvable by multi-prover interactive proofs | Statement: [MIP = NEXP, equatesComplexityClass, class of problems solvable by multi-prover interactive proofs]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: equatesComplexityClass
Context triple: [MIP = NEXP, equatesComplexityClass, class of problems solvable by multi-prover interactive proofs]
  • A. complexityClassRelation chosen
    Indicates a relationship between two computational complexity classes, such as inclusion, equivalence, or separation, within the hierarchy of complexity theory.
  • B. hasComplexity
    Indicates that something possesses a certain level or type of complexity, often in terms of structure, behavior, or difficulty.
  • C. hasReasoningComplexity
    Indicates that an action, process, or decision involves a certain level or type of cognitive or logical complexity in its reasoning.
  • D. computationalClass
    Indicates that two entities share the same computational complexity class or that one entity is categorized within a specified computational complexity class.
  • E. typicalComplexity
    Indicates the usual or characteristic level of complexity associated with an entity, process, or situation.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d85a0dde7481908fc64d1e82d5d20d completed April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e007f306f08190be448b215d6c9b6c completed April 15, 2026, 9:49 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69deca899d5c8190be4a7c71e1683c69 completed April 14, 2026, 11:15 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:13 a.m.