Triple

T15157240
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject United States v. Classic E362108 entity
Predicate relatedTo P37 FINISHED
Object Ex parte Yarbrough
Ex parte Yarbrough is an 1884 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld federal authority to protect African American voting rights in federal elections against private interference and violence.
E1140393 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (4 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ex parte Yarbrough | Statement: [United States v. Classic, relatedTo, Ex parte Yarbrough]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Ex parte Yarbrough
Context triple: [United States v. Classic, relatedTo, Ex parte Yarbrough]
  • A. Ex parte Garland
    Ex parte Garland is an 1867 U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited Congress’s power to impose loyalty oaths and affirmed presidential pardon authority in the post–Civil War era.
  • B. Ex parte McCardle
    Ex parte McCardle is an 1869 U.S. Supreme Court case best known for affirming Congress’s power to limit the Court’s appellate jurisdiction under Article III of the Constitution.
  • C. Briggs v. Elliott
    Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
  • D. Powell v. Alabama
    Powell v. Alabama is a landmark 1932 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held in capital cases the Due Process Clause requires defendants be given access to effective legal counsel, especially when they are young, illiterate, or otherwise disadvantaged.
  • E. Yates v. United States
    Yates v. United States is a 1957 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed the application of the Smith Act by distinguishing between the advocacy of abstract doctrine and the advocacy of concrete action to overthrow the government.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg Description generation gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Ex parte Yarbrough
Triple: [United States v. Classic, relatedTo, Ex parte Yarbrough]
Generated description
Ex parte Yarbrough is an 1884 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld federal authority to protect African American voting rights in federal elections against private interference and violence.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Ex parte Yarbrough
Target entity description: Ex parte Yarbrough is an 1884 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld federal authority to protect African American voting rights in federal elections against private interference and violence.
  • A. Ex parte Garland
    Ex parte Garland is an 1867 U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited Congress’s power to impose loyalty oaths and affirmed presidential pardon authority in the post–Civil War era.
  • B. Ex parte McCardle
    Ex parte McCardle is an 1869 U.S. Supreme Court case best known for affirming Congress’s power to limit the Court’s appellate jurisdiction under Article III of the Constitution.
  • C. Briggs v. Elliott
    Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
  • D. Powell v. Alabama
    Powell v. Alabama is a landmark 1932 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held in capital cases the Due Process Clause requires defendants be given access to effective legal counsel, especially when they are young, illiterate, or otherwise disadvantaged.
  • E. Yates v. United States
    Yates v. United States is a 1957 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed the application of the Smith Act by distinguishing between the advocacy of abstract doctrine and the advocacy of concrete action to overthrow the government.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (5 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d85a0759908190b8a051d2e2a1cbe6 completed April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e0060c62b08190bcdbd912d011d1ba completed April 15, 2026, 9:41 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69febff87b6c819097f5cc99b2d75fb6 completed May 9, 2026, 5:02 a.m.
NEDg Description generation batch_69fec1c2ce5c81909e2df69e4cf80344 completed May 9, 2026, 5:10 a.m.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) batch_69fec25d50548190a056d6bb1297e780 completed May 9, 2026, 5:13 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:08 a.m.