Triple

T15157205
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject United States v. Classic E362108 entity
Predicate fullCaseName P3131 FINISHED
Object United States v. Classic et al. E362108 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: United States v. Classic et al. | Statement: [United States v. Classic, fullCaseName, United States v. Classic et al.]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: United States v. Classic et al.
Context triple: [United States v. Classic, fullCaseName, United States v. Classic et al.]
  • A. United States v. Classic chosen
    United States v. Classic is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court decision that expanded federal authority over primary elections by holding that Congress can regulate primaries when they are an integral part of the electoral process for federal offices.
  • B. United States v. Bajakajian
    United States v. Bajakajian is a 1998 U.S. Supreme Court case that held, for the first time, that a criminal forfeiture could violate the Eighth Amendment’s Excessive Fines Clause if it is grossly disproportionate to the gravity of the offense.
  • C. United States v. Singleton
    United States v. Singleton is one of the 1883 U.S. Supreme Court decisions collectively known as the Civil Rights Cases, which limited federal enforcement of civil rights protections against private discrimination.
  • D. United States of America v. Ulrich Greifelt, et al.
    United States of America v. Ulrich Greifelt, et al. was a post–World War II Nuremberg Military Tribunal case prosecuting SS officials for racial policies, including kidnapping, Germanization, and persecution in occupied Eastern Europe.
  • E. United States v. Gratiot
    United States v. Gratiot is an 1840 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld broad federal authority over public lands under the Constitution’s Property Clause.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d85a0759908190b8a051d2e2a1cbe6 completed April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e0060c62b08190bcdbd912d011d1ba completed April 15, 2026, 9:41 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69febff87b6c819097f5cc99b2d75fb6 completed May 9, 2026, 5:02 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:08 a.m.