Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Federal Rule of Evidence 611 | Statement: [Federal Rule of Evidence 1006, distinguishedFrom, Federal Rule of Evidence 611]

Target entity: Federal Rule of Evidence 611
Context triple: [Federal Rule of Evidence 1006, distinguishedFrom, Federal Rule of Evidence 611]

• A. Federal Rules of Evidence Rule 603
  Federal Rules of Evidence Rule 603 is the U.S. evidentiary rule that requires witnesses to take an oath or affirmation to testify truthfully before giving evidence in court.
• B. Federal Rule of Evidence 1007
  Federal Rule of Evidence 1007 is a U.S. evidentiary rule that allows a party to prove the contents of a writing, recording, or photograph through the testimony or written statement of the opposing party without producing the original.
• C. Fed. R. Evid. 612
  Fed. R. Evid. 612 is the federal evidence rule that governs how and when a witness may use a writing to refresh their memory while testifying and the opposing party’s rights to inspect and use that writing.
• D. Rule 611 chosen
  Rule 611 is a provision in the Federal Rules of Evidence that governs the court’s control over the mode and order of examining witnesses and presenting evidence to ensure effective truth-finding and fairness.
• E. Rule 608 of the Federal Rules of Evidence
  Rule 608 of the Federal Rules of Evidence governs how a witness’s character for truthfulness may be attacked or supported, including the use of opinion, reputation, and certain specific instances of conduct.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.