Triple

T1440576
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Bostock v. Clayton County E31059 entity
Predicate consolidatedWith P7838 FINISHED
Object R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission E165285 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission | Statement: [Bostock v. Clayton County, consolidatedWith, R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Context triple: [Bostock v. Clayton County, consolidatedWith, R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission]
  • A. R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission chosen
    R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed whether federal employment discrimination law protects transgender employees from being fired because of their gender identity.
  • B. EEOC v. Waffle House, Inc.
    EEOC v. Waffle House, Inc. is a 2002 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission can pursue victim-specific relief in court for an employee despite that employee’s agreement to arbitrate disputes with the employer.
  • C. Altitude Express Inc. v. Zarda
    Altitude Express Inc. v. Zarda is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that held federal employment discrimination law protects gay and lesbian employees from being fired because of their sexual orientation.
  • D. Griggs v. Duke Power Co.
    Griggs v. Duke Power Co. is a 1971 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the doctrine of disparate impact in employment discrimination law, holding that seemingly neutral job requirements that disproportionately exclude protected groups can violate Title VII.
  • E. Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon
    Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon is a state agency responsible for administering employment-related services and regulations in Oregon, including unemployment insurance and workforce programs.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a4991633388190a4d61b5a98aa407a completed March 1, 2026, 7:52 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4c5307e988190b392f1f1d1ac10f0 completed March 1, 2026, 11:01 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69ad0e6e12748190baeb91ba843a716f completed March 8, 2026, 5:51 a.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 8 p.m.