Triple

T1433243
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Theophilus E30497 entity
Predicate possibleRole P28456 FINISHED
Object literary patron of Luke LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: literary patron of Luke | Statement: [Theophilus, possibleRole, literary patron of Luke]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: possibleRole
Context triple: [Theophilus, possibleRole, literary patron of Luke]
  • A. plannedRole
    Indicates that an entity is expected or intended to assume a particular role or function in a planned or future context.
  • B. qualifyingRole
    Indicates that an entity holds a role, position, or function that qualifies or entitles it (or another entity) to participate in a specified activity, status, or relationship.
  • C. servesRole
    Indicates that one entity performs, fulfills, or occupies a particular function, position, or responsibility in relation to another entity.
  • D. identificationRole
    Indicates that an entity serves as an identifier or plays a role in uniquely distinguishing or recognizing another entity.
  • E. typeOfRole
    Indicates that one entity specifies the kind or category of role that another entity holds or performs.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a498fc69ec8190b61722bd4b67c4d2 completed March 1, 2026, 7:52 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4c500a9888190a16fbb1ec97a79c9 completed March 1, 2026, 11 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4c4771c9481908ae47c959debbe77 completed March 1, 2026, 10:57 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a4c4feea448190b2b5071b28a5b608 completed March 1, 2026, 11 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 8 p.m.