Triple

T14282867
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Bogra Formula E354092 entity
Predicate constitutionalIssueAddressed P108019 FINISHED
Object disparity between population and political power of East Pakistan LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: disparity between population and political power of East Pakistan | Statement: [Bogra Formula, constitutionalIssueAddressed, disparity between population and political power of East Pakistan]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: constitutionalIssueAddressed
Context triple: [Bogra Formula, constitutionalIssueAddressed, disparity between population and political power of East Pakistan]
  • A. constitutionalChallenge
    Indicates a legal action or argument asserting that a law, policy, or governmental act violates a constitution and should be reviewed or invalidated.
  • B. constitutionalImplication
    Indicates that one constitutional provision, principle, or rule logically entails, influences, or gives rise to another within a legal or governmental framework.
  • C. constitutionalSubjectArea chosen
    Indicates that something pertains to, falls within, or is classified under a particular constitutional law subject area.
  • D. constitutionalProvisionNotAtIssue
    Indicates that a particular constitutional provision is acknowledged in the case context but is not being challenged, interpreted, or directly decided upon as part of the legal issue.
  • E. constitutionalDebate
    Indicates a relationship where parties are engaged in discussing, disputing, or interpreting the meaning, scope, or application of a constitution.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8278d25148190abf1a8c8f5f533ad completed April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69de697d9fd08190b0cd7a6a6737ba03 completed April 14, 2026, 4:21 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69de2a88446481909cd526da97a3b70f completed April 14, 2026, 11:52 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:10 a.m.