Triple

T14208233
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Battle of Magnesia E352156 entity
Predicate RomanArmyFeatures P86508 FINISHED
Object legionary infantry LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: legionary infantry | Statement: [Battle of Magnesia, RomanArmyFeatures, legionary infantry]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: RomanArmyFeatures
Context triple: [Battle of Magnesia, RomanArmyFeatures, legionary infantry]
  • A. RomanArmyType chosen
    Indicates the specific organizational or functional category to which a Roman military force belongs (e.g., legion, auxiliary, navy).
  • B. RomanLegionsPresent
    Indicates that Roman military legions are present at or within the specified location or context.
  • C. RomanLegionsDestroyed
    Indicates that one or more Roman legions were annihilated or decisively defeated, typically resulting in their destruction as effective military units.
  • D. ParthianCommander
    Indicates that an entity serves as a military commander within the Parthian context or forces.
  • E. RomanCommander
    Indicates a relationship where an entity holds the role or position of a commander within a Roman military or organizational context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8278a06e481908b5d6af0a8afe737 completed April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69de61fa8d24819092a8ec5d34c1c799 completed April 14, 2026, 3:49 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69de05bcd7d48190a4848d9320404aa6 completed April 14, 2026, 9:15 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:05 a.m.