Triple
T13946169
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | no miracles argument |
E335390
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | argument for scientific realism |
C34411
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: argument for scientific realism Context triple: [no miracles argument, instanceOf, argument for scientific realism]
-
A.
philosophy of science
Philosophy of science is the systematic study of the methods, foundations, assumptions, and implications of science, including how scientific knowledge is generated, justified, and evaluated.
-
B.
structural realism
Structural realism is a philosophical position in the philosophy of science that holds we should be committed only to the structural or relational aspects of scientific theories, rather than to their claims about the intrinsic nature of unobservable entities.
-
C.
philosophy of science research institute
A philosophy of science research institute is an academic center dedicated to investigating the foundations, methods, and implications of scientific practice through rigorous philosophical analysis and interdisciplinary collaboration.
-
D.
doctrine of logical positivism
The doctrine of logical positivism is a philosophical view that holds only empirically verifiable statements and logical truths as meaningful, rejecting metaphysics and ethical claims as cognitively meaningless.
-
E.
theory of truth
A theory of truth is a conceptual framework that explains what it means for statements, beliefs, or propositions to be true and how their truth is determined or justified.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d81c6081b88190b53e317c3370c8fe |
completed | April 9, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 10:17 p.m.