Triple
T13892351
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hempel's paradox |
E334005
|
entity |
| Predicate | alsoKnownAs |
P39
|
FINISHED |
| Object | the paradox of the ravens |
E334006
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: the paradox of the ravens | Statement: [Hempel's paradox, alsoKnownAs, the paradox of the ravens]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: the paradox of the ravens Context triple: [Hempel's paradox, alsoKnownAs, the paradox of the ravens]
-
A.
Hempel's paradox
Hempel's paradox is a famous problem in the philosophy of science that challenges our intuitions about confirmation by showing how evidence seemingly unrelated to a hypothesis can still count as confirming it.
-
B.
ravens paradox
chosen
Ravens paradox is a famous problem in the philosophy of science that challenges our intuitions about confirmation and evidence by suggesting that observing non-black non-ravens can confirm the hypothesis that all ravens are black.
-
C.
Studies in the Logic of Confirmation
"Studies in the Logic of Confirmation" is a seminal philosophical paper by Carl Gustav Hempel that analyzes how empirical evidence supports scientific hypotheses and introduces influential paradoxes about confirmation.
-
D.
new riddle of induction
The new riddle of induction is Nelson Goodman’s influential philosophical problem that challenges traditional accounts of inductive reasoning by introducing the notion of “grue” and questioning how we justify projecting certain predicates into the future.
-
E.
Against the Logicians
Against the Logicians is an influential work of ancient Pyrrhonian skepticism by Sextus Empiricus that critically examines and challenges the foundations of logical theory and dogmatic reasoning.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d81c5dd2d48190b7a5fc1e009de936 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de23a537d4819093c2bae2a244816a |
completed | April 14, 2026, 11:23 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69fba1c0b6848190b67051e0ccbdb707 |
completed | May 6, 2026, 8:17 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 10:15 p.m.