Triple
T13892348
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hempel's paradox |
E334005
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | problem in the philosophy of science |
C28682
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: problem in the philosophy of science Context triple: [Hempel's paradox, instanceOf, problem in the philosophy of science]
-
A.
philosophy of science
Philosophy of science is the systematic study of the methods, foundations, assumptions, and implications of science, including how scientific knowledge is generated, justified, and evaluated.
-
B.
philosophy of science research institute
A philosophy of science research institute is an academic center dedicated to investigating the foundations, methods, and implications of scientific practice through rigorous philosophical analysis and interdisciplinary collaboration.
-
C.
doctrine of logical positivism
The doctrine of logical positivism is a philosophical view that holds only empirically verifiable statements and logical truths as meaningful, rejecting metaphysics and ethical claims as cognitively meaningless.
-
D.
concept in analytic philosophy
chosen
In analytic philosophy, a concept is an abstract, mentally graspable unit of meaning that structures thought and language, enabling the classification, comparison, and analysis of objects, properties, and relations.
-
E.
philosophical method
A philosophical method is a systematic approach or set of procedures used to analyze, clarify, and evaluate concepts, arguments, and questions about reality, knowledge, and value.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d81c5dd2d48190b7a5fc1e009de936 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 10:15 p.m.