Triple
T13782571
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gelbard v. United States |
E331165
|
entity |
| Predicate | citationStyle |
P4468
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Gelbard v. United States, 408 U.S. 41 (1972) |
E331165
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Gelbard v. United States, 408 U.S. 41 (1972) | Statement: [Gelbard v. United States, citationStyle, Gelbard v. United States, 408 U.S. 41 (1972)]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Gelbard v. United States, 408 U.S. 41 (1972) Context triple: [Gelbard v. United States, citationStyle, Gelbard v. United States, 408 U.S. 41 (1972)]
-
A.
Gelbard v. United States
chosen
Gelbard v. United States is a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed whether grand jury witnesses could refuse to answer questions based on the government's alleged illegal use of wiretap evidence.
-
B.
Gall v. United States
Gall v. United States is a 2007 U.S. Supreme Court decision that clarified federal sentencing discretion by holding that appellate courts must review all sentences, including those outside the Sentencing Guidelines, under a deferential abuse-of-discretion standard.
-
C.
Girouard v. United States
Girouard v. United States is a 1946 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held religious pacifists could become naturalized citizens without being willing to bear arms in defense of the country.
-
D.
Goldman v. United States
Goldman v. United States is a 1942 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld warrantless electronic eavesdropping based on a narrow, property-based interpretation of the Fourth Amendment, later limited by the Court’s shift to a privacy-based approach.
-
E.
United States v. O'Brien
United States v. O'Brien is a landmark 1968 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a federal law banning the destruction of draft cards and established an important test for evaluating government regulation of symbolic speech under the First Amendment.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d81c58feb08190a77bca8bf7d6d20f |
completed | April 9, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de0247ccc881908dad7b547221f15d |
completed | April 14, 2026, 9 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f7b07b0b2881909b316e3cc67f1ec1 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:30 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 10:11 p.m.