Triple
T1324195
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hanbali school |
E28287
|
entity |
| Predicate | viewOnTheology |
P4935
|
FINISHED |
| Object | associated with Athari creed |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: associated with Athari creed | Statement: [Hanbali school, viewOnTheology, associated with Athari creed]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: viewOnTheology Context triple: [Hanbali school, viewOnTheology, associated with Athari creed]
-
A.
positionOnTheology
chosen
Indicates a stance, viewpoint, or opinion that one entity holds regarding theological beliefs, doctrines, or issues.
-
B.
viewOnGod
Indicates a relationship where one entity holds or expresses a particular opinion, belief, or perspective about God.
-
C.
theologicalFocus
Indicates that something is primarily concerned with, centered on, or directed toward theological themes, questions, or doctrines.
-
D.
theologicalCategory
Indicates the classification of something according to a particular theological type, tradition, or doctrinal category.
-
E.
viewOnCreeds
Indicates a relationship where one party holds or expresses a particular stance, opinion, or interpretation regarding a set of creeds or formal beliefs.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a498540a2481909e807a762280d3ba |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:49 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4c19e81c0819092f85201ae34422a |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:45 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4beedb49c8190beb5b85cdda05013 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:34 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:55 p.m.