Triple
T13175349
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Altamira Cave |
E313083
|
entity |
| Predicate | initialScholarlyReaction |
P67773
|
FINISHED |
| Object | authenticity disputed in late 19th century |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: authenticity disputed in late 19th century | Statement: [Altamira Cave, initialScholarlyReaction, authenticity disputed in late 19th century]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: initialScholarlyReaction Context triple: [Altamira Cave, initialScholarlyReaction, authenticity disputed in late 19th century]
-
A.
scholarlyView
Indicates that one entity holds an academic or research-based interpretation, opinion, or theoretical stance about another entity.
-
B.
influencedScholar
Indicates that one scholar has had a significant intellectual or academic impact on another scholar’s work, ideas, or development.
-
C.
questionedByScholars
chosen
Indicates that the subject has been critically examined, challenged, or doubted by scholars or academic researchers.
-
D.
initialPublication
Indicates the relationship in which a work is first formally published or made publicly available.
-
E.
inAcademicDebate
Indicates that one entity is engaged in a formal, scholarly argument or discussion with another entity, typically following academic norms and methods of reasoning.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d806ac3ee081909b2fd27d060aa974 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d98cf054f88190b05ced98d5a22a62 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:51 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d98bc2c0c88190be357811aa8e828d |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:46 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:14 p.m.