Triple
T131719
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Nash bargaining solution |
E2666
|
entity |
| Predicate | solutionForm |
P3660
|
FINISHED |
| Object | argmax of (u1 - d1)(u2 - d2) over feasible set |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: argmax of (u1 - d1)(u2 - d2) over feasible set | Statement: [Nash bargaining solution, solutionForm, argmax of (u1 - d1)(u2 - d2) over feasible set]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: solutionForm Context triple: [Nash bargaining solution, solutionForm, argmax of (u1 - d1)(u2 - d2) over feasible set]
-
A.
solutionType
Indicates the specific category or kind of solution associated with an entity or problem.
-
B.
admitsSolution
Indicates that a problem, system, or situation allows for or possesses at least one valid solution.
-
C.
hasFormulation
chosen
Indicates that one entity is expressed, prepared, or configured in a particular form or composition defined by another entity.
-
D.
support
Indicates that one entity provides assistance, endorsement, or backing to another entity or its actions.
-
E.
dissolved
Indicates that one substance has been mixed into another so thoroughly that it forms a uniform solution and is no longer distinguishable as a separate phase.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2520c0f3481908b0ed054a2fca8d0 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a25855baf48190a1b63f2e5865d957 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:52 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2564edb488190974dc00eb9ac37d9 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:43 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:30 a.m.