Triple

T13125733
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Gold E311837 entity
Predicate standardElectrodePotential P108184 FINISHED
Object +1.50 V LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: +1.50 V | Statement: [Gold, standardElectrodePotential, +1.50 V]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: standardElectrodePotential
Context triple: [Gold, standardElectrodePotential, +1.50 V]
  • A. standardReductionPotentialCu2plusToCu
    Indicates the standard electrode potential associated with the half-reaction in which Cu²⁺ ions are reduced to solid copper (Cu) under standard conditions.
  • B. electronegativityPauling
    Indicates the relative tendency of an atom to attract shared electrons in a chemical bond, as quantified on the Pauling electronegativity scale.
  • C. electrodeType
    Indicates the specific kind or classification of an electrode associated with an entity or used in a given context.
  • D. predominantOxidationStateInSolution
    Indicates the oxidation state that a chemical species most commonly or primarily adopts when present in a given solution.
  • E. secondaryOxidationStateInSolution
    Indicates the oxidation state an element or species commonly adopts as a secondary (non-primary) state when dissolved in a given solution.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d806a9fe888190b081e2d9ea665d6c completed April 9, 2026, 8:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d9819946808190b41335fb1054accd completed April 10, 2026, 11:02 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d98043a74c81908648e6cd0b4c7f71 completed April 10, 2026, 10:57 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69d98134df64819084a5674f9475dcc2 completed April 10, 2026, 11:01 p.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:07 p.m.