Triple
T13114148
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Vorpommern-Greifswald |
E311048
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasMajorRiver |
P165
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Oder |
E28210
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Oder | Statement: [Vorpommern-Greifswald, hasMajorRiver, Oder]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Oder Context triple: [Vorpommern-Greifswald, hasMajorRiver, Oder]
-
A.
Oder River
chosen
The Oder River is a major Central European river that flows through the Czech Republic, Poland, and along the Polish–German border before emptying into the Baltic Sea.
-
B.
Krzyworzeka River
Krzyworzeka River is a minor river in southern Poland that serves as one of the tributaries feeding into the Raba River.
-
C.
Bóbr River
The Bóbr River is a major river in southwestern Poland that flows through the Sudetes and Lower Silesia before joining the Oder.
-
D.
Wierna Rzeka
Wierna Rzeka is a river in south-central Poland, known for flowing through the Świętokrzyskie region and lending its name to a famous Polish historical novel.
-
E.
Wisła
Wisła is a popular mountain town and resort in southern Poland, known as the source of the Vistula River and a center for skiing and hiking tourism.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d806a872d08190a329806f8ff30df4 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d9817f8ee8819084078b4bec5e4f18 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:02 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f78acdaae881908825e5308f0ba388 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:50 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:06 p.m.