Triple
T12945564
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gibbs free energy |
E309752
|
entity |
| Predicate | conjugateVariable |
P107624
|
FINISHED |
| Object | chemical potential μ_i |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: chemical potential μ_i | Statement: [Gibbs free energy, conjugateVariable, chemical potential μ_i]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: conjugateVariable Context triple: [Gibbs free energy, conjugateVariable, chemical potential μ_i]
-
A.
conjugate
Indicates that one entity is a grammatical or mathematical counterpart of another, linked by a specific transformation such as verb inflection or complex-number pairing.
-
B.
usesVAR
Indicates that one entity makes use of, employs, or utilizes another entity as a variable or resource in performing some function or operation.
-
C.
hasConjugateField
Indicates that one field is the conjugate (typically complex-conjugate-related) counterpart of another field.
-
D.
variant
Indicates that one entity is an alternative form, version, or variation of another entity.
-
E.
fixedFieldOfComplexConjugation
Indicates the relation where a field is precisely the set of elements left unchanged by the complex conjugation automorphism on a larger complex field.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d7bdfb57a88190836b743e2825feca |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d97e59a4c88190907d05b8d57dae89 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:48 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d97db69f548190a1a693bc0d6c191a |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:46 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d97e5811f481908178fac6d2e0efcd |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:48 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:43 p.m.