Triple

T12742596
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Slivovitz E304523 entity
Predicate hasLegalProtectionType P15826 FINISHED
Object geographical indication (for some regional variants) LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: geographical indication (for some regional variants) | Statement: [Slivovitz, hasLegalProtectionType, geographical indication (for some regional variants)]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLegalProtectionType
Context triple: [Slivovitz, hasLegalProtectionType, geographical indication (for some regional variants)]
  • A. isProtectedByLawIn
    Indicates that an entity is safeguarded or granted legal protection within a specified jurisdiction or legal framework.
  • B. legalProtectionFor
    Indicates that one entity provides or is subject to legal safeguards, rights, or defenses in favor of another entity or interest.
  • C. hasLegalRight
    Indicates that an entity possesses an officially recognized legal entitlement or permission to perform an action or hold a claim regarding another entity.
  • D. protectionType chosen
    Indicates the kind or method of protection that is applied to or associated with an entity.
  • E. hasLegalSubject
    Indicates that an entity serves as the legal subject (e.g., rights-holder or obligated party) in a legal relationship or context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d7bdf1426c8190a4402e1c4cdec33a completed April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d96d89ea70819098c470344f172167 completed April 10, 2026, 9:37 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d96406e97c8190b79081039847115c completed April 10, 2026, 8:56 p.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:26 p.m.