Triple
T12628916
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Warren Court era |
E301587
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableDoctrine |
P5485
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Miranda warnings |
E8268
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Miranda warnings | Statement: [Warren Court era, notableDoctrine, Miranda warnings]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Miranda warnings Context triple: [Warren Court era, notableDoctrine, Miranda warnings]
-
A.
The Right to Remain Silent
The Right to Remain Silent is a legal-themed work, likely a drama or crime story, centered on issues of criminal justice and constitutional protections, authored by Gerald W. Abrams.
-
B.
The Right to Remain Silent
The Right to Remain Silent is a crime novel by Charles Brandt that showcases his expertise in criminal law and interrogation through a tense, procedurally detailed narrative.
-
C.
Miranda v. Arizona
chosen
Miranda v. Arizona is a landmark 1966 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the requirement for police to inform criminal suspects of their rights to remain silent and to have an attorney present during custodial interrogations.
-
D.
Habeas Corpus
Habeas Corpus is a 1973 stage farce by British playwright Alan Bennett that satirizes sexual liberation and middle-class morality through rapid-fire wordplay and mistaken identities.
-
E.
New York v. Quarles
New York v. Quarles is a 1984 U.S. Supreme Court decision that created the "public safety" exception to the Miranda warning requirement, allowing certain unwarned statements to be admitted when needed to protect public safety.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d7bdeaf49c8190b13800111fa77ea3 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d9610ce9e48190a496824002c0d2be |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:43 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f65edafc7c819088bd641542a32e39 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:30 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:15 p.m.