Triple

T12527815
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Roberts v. Louisiana E299483 entity
Predicate relatedCase P3137 FINISHED
Object Furman v. Georgia E8035 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Furman v. Georgia | Statement: [Roberts v. Louisiana, relatedCase, Furman v. Georgia]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Furman v. Georgia
Context triple: [Roberts v. Louisiana, relatedCase, Furman v. Georgia]
  • A. Furman v. Georgia chosen
    Furman v. Georgia is a landmark 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that temporarily halted capital punishment nationwide by ruling existing death penalty schemes unconstitutional under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments.
  • B. Coker v. Georgia
    Coker v. Georgia is a 1977 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the death penalty is a disproportionate punishment for the crime of raping an adult woman, thereby limiting the application of capital punishment under the Eighth Amendment.
  • C. Atkins v. Virginia
    Atkins v. Virginia is a 2002 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held executing individuals with intellectual disabilities violates the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment.
  • D. McCleskey v. Kemp
    McCleskey v. Kemp is a landmark 1987 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court rejected a constitutional challenge to the death penalty based on statistical evidence of racial disparities in its application.
  • E. Swain v. Alabama
    Swain v. Alabama was a 1965 U.S. Supreme Court decision that set a high evidentiary bar for proving racial discrimination in jury selection, later overturned by Batson v. Kentucky.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6ada5cdd48190860d9ce30aff69be completed April 8, 2026, 7:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d9545e90948190980bd4d64964a0f2 completed April 10, 2026, 7:49 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69f65eae71fc819083ec63dbfbf32465 completed May 2, 2026, 8:29 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:57 p.m.