Triple

T12527772
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Woodson v. North Carolina E299482 entity
Predicate relatedCase P3137 FINISHED
Object Jurek v. Texas E266471 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Jurek v. Texas | Statement: [Woodson v. North Carolina, relatedCase, Jurek v. Texas]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Jurek v. Texas
Context triple: [Woodson v. North Carolina, relatedCase, Jurek v. Texas]
  • A. Jurek v. Texas chosen
    Jurek v. Texas is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the constitutionality of Texas’s capital sentencing scheme and helped define the modern framework for death penalty procedures under the Eighth Amendment.
  • B. Moore v. Texas
    Moore v. Texas is a U.S. Supreme Court case that refined the standards for determining intellectual disability in capital cases, reinforcing constitutional limits on executing individuals with such disabilities.
  • C. Aguilar v. Texas
    Aguilar v. Texas is a 1964 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established a two-pronged test for evaluating the sufficiency of informants’ tips in supporting probable cause for search warrants.
  • D. Carmell v. Texas
    Carmell v. Texas is a 2000 U.S. Supreme Court decision that clarified the scope of the Constitution’s Ex Post Facto Clause by holding that a law easing the evidentiary requirements for conviction in certain sexual offense cases could not be applied retroactively.
  • E. Zurawski v. State of Texas
    Zurawski v. State of Texas is a high-profile lawsuit in which women denied medically necessary abortions challenge the state’s near-total abortion ban as unconstitutional and dangerously restrictive to pregnant patients’ health.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6ada5cdd48190860d9ce30aff69be completed April 8, 2026, 7:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d9545e90948190980bd4d64964a0f2 completed April 10, 2026, 7:49 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69f655762ae88190ab41e23bbd65c566 completed May 2, 2026, 7:50 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:57 p.m.