Triple
T12326421
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Madama Butterfly |
E293840
|
entity |
| Predicate | vocalTypeOfCioCioSan |
P104490
|
FINISHED |
| Object | soprano |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: soprano | Statement: [Madama Butterfly, vocalTypeOfCioCioSan, soprano]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: vocalTypeOfCioCioSan Context triple: [Madama Butterfly, vocalTypeOfCioCioSan, soprano]
-
A.
hasNotableVocalType
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific, noteworthy type or quality of vocalization or voice.
-
B.
vocalHarmonyType
Indicates the specific kind or style of vocal harmony relationship that exists between the involved vocal parts or voices.
-
C.
vocalGender
Indicates the perceived or assigned gender associated with an entity’s voice in a vocal performance or recording.
-
D.
isVocalShowcaseFor
Indicates that something serves as a performance or context specifically designed to highlight and display another entity’s vocal abilities.
-
E.
vocalistIn
Indicates that a person serves as a vocalist (singer) in a particular musical group, band, or ensemble.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ab6ae0dc8190b1522a9c1c55c114 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:24 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d93f621570819091ee1db2609233ea |
completed | April 10, 2026, 6:20 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d93ec5be788190b82d2edc6a0f1095 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 6:17 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d93f607a88819089e89fd263ae9937 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 6:20 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:53 p.m.