Triple

T12270798
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject partial-birth abortion E292463 entity
Predicate isSubjectOf P380 FINISHED
Object United States Supreme Court case Gonzales v. Carhart E649381 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: United States Supreme Court case Gonzales v. Carhart | Statement: [partial-birth abortion, isSubjectOf, United States Supreme Court case Gonzales v. Carhart]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: United States Supreme Court case Gonzales v. Carhart
Context triple: [partial-birth abortion, isSubjectOf, United States Supreme Court case Gonzales v. Carhart]
  • A. Gonzales v. Carhart chosen
    Gonzales v. Carhart is a 2007 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the federal Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act, marking a significant shift in abortion jurisprudence by allowing broader government regulation of certain abortion procedures.
  • B. Stenberg v. Carhart
    Stenberg v. Carhart is a 2000 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a Nebraska law banning so-called “partial-birth abortion” as unconstitutional for lacking a health exception for the mother and imposing an undue burden on abortion access.
  • C. Planned Parenthood v. Abbott
    Planned Parenthood v. Abbott is a 2013 federal court case in which abortion providers challenged Texas restrictions that imposed stringent requirements on abortion clinics and physicians, arguing they placed an undue burden on women seeking abortions.
  • D. Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.
    Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that closely held for-profit corporations can claim religious exemptions from certain federal regulations under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.
  • E. Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt
    Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt is a 2016 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down Texas abortion restrictions as imposing an undue burden on women’s constitutional right to access abortion.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6ab6856488190b5d31178d5015f8e completed April 8, 2026, 7:24 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d91cdea6e881908e13f8259bad6ddc completed April 10, 2026, 3:53 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69f61e6981b48190a0fc5a571c425be1 completed May 2, 2026, 3:55 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:52 p.m.