Triple

T12152078
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject anomalous monism E289479 entity
Predicate holdsAboutMentalPredicates P99469 FINISHED
Object mental predicates are not suitable for inclusion in strict laws LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: mental predicates are not suitable for inclusion in strict laws | Statement: [anomalous monism, holdsAboutMentalPredicates, mental predicates are not suitable for inclusion in strict laws]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: holdsAboutMentalPredicates
Context triple: [anomalous monism, holdsAboutMentalPredicates, mental predicates are not suitable for inclusion in strict laws]
  • A. hasCognitiveComponent
    Indicates that the related entity or process involves or depends on mental activities such as thinking, reasoning, perception, or understanding.
  • B. subjectHasCharacteristic chosen
    Indicates that a subject possesses, exhibits, or is defined by a particular characteristic or attribute.
  • C. holdsIn
    Indicates that a relationship, condition, or event is valid or occurs within a specified time interval or temporal context.
  • D. hasMood
    Indicates that an entity is experiencing or characterized by a particular emotional or affective state.
  • E. holdsUnder
    Indicates that one entity maintains possession, control, or validity of another entity subject to certain conditions, constraints, or a specific context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6ab4c6710819097a9d228382dde43 completed April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d915d7109481908bf5fe512bba3c89 completed April 10, 2026, 3:23 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d9150c18148190bf8152189c0e5fca completed April 10, 2026, 3:19 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:49 p.m.