Triple

T12063660
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Pelly River E287237 entity
Predicate hasNearbyIndigenousGroup P27399 FINISHED
Object Tlingit E9440 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Tlingit | Statement: [Pelly River, hasNearbyIndigenousGroup, Tlingit]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Tlingit
Context triple: [Pelly River, hasNearbyIndigenousGroup, Tlingit]
  • A. Tlingit chosen
    Tlingit is an Indigenous language of the Pacific Northwest Coast, traditionally spoken by the Tlingit people of southeastern Alaska and western Canada.
  • B. Athabaskan–Eyak–Tlingit
    Athabaskan–Eyak–Tlingit is a proposed Native North American language family grouping that links the Athabaskan languages, Eyak, and Tlingit into a single genetic unit.
  • C. Alutiiq
    Alutiiq is an Indigenous language of the Alutiiq (Sugpiaq) people of south-central coastal Alaska, particularly Kodiak Island and the surrounding regions.
  • D. Inupiaq
    Inupiaq is an Indigenous Inuit language spoken by the Inupiat people of northern and northwestern Alaska and parts of Arctic Canada.
  • E. Eyak language
    The Eyak language is an extinct Na-Dené language once spoken by the Eyak people of south-central Alaska, now primarily documented through linguistic records and revitalization efforts.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6ab4846e081908ee7bbd66a6d3459 completed April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d90440dd988190ae2b80367aceb6f7 completed April 10, 2026, 2:08 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69f60a64c8bc8190920c1ed858ea4794 completed May 2, 2026, 2:29 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:48 p.m.