Triple

T11998625
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject John F. A. Sandford E285593 entity
Predicate caseImpact P39579 FINISHED
Object Dred Scott v. Sandford intensified sectional conflict over slavery in the United States E54704 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Dred Scott v. Sandford intensified sectional conflict over slavery in the United States | Statement: [John F. A. Sandford, caseImpact, Dred Scott v. Sandford intensified sectional conflict over slavery in the United States]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Dred Scott v. Sandford intensified sectional conflict over slavery in the United States
Context triple: [John F. A. Sandford, caseImpact, Dred Scott v. Sandford intensified sectional conflict over slavery in the United States]
  • A. Dred Scott v. Sandford chosen
    Dred Scott v. Sandford was an 1857 U.S. Supreme Court decision that infamously denied citizenship and constitutional rights to African Americans and helped accelerate tensions leading to the Civil War.
  • B. Supreme Court decision in Chisholm v. Georgia
    The Supreme Court decision in Chisholm v. Georgia (1793) was an early and controversial ruling that allowed a citizen of one state to sue another state in federal court, prompting the swift adoption of the Eleventh Amendment to limit such suits.
  • C. Ableman v. Booth
    Ableman v. Booth was an 1859 U.S. Supreme Court case that affirmed federal supremacy over state courts in enforcing the Fugitive Slave Act before the Civil War.
  • D. Martin v. Hunter's Lessee
    Martin v. Hunter's Lessee is an 1816 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the Court's authority to review state court decisions on federal law, reinforcing federal judicial supremacy.
  • E. Insular Cases
    The Insular Cases are a series of early 20th-century U.S. Supreme Court decisions that defined the constitutional status and rights of residents in American overseas territories.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6ab44a77c8190a652f4b27164e4ef completed April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d903c26d7881909b67a31d04882eb5 completed April 10, 2026, 2:05 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69f472917ed08190a872d9e5663d5ed5 completed May 1, 2026, 9:29 a.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:46 p.m.