Triple

T11974105
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Nebbia v. New York E284993 entity
Predicate relatedCase P3137 FINISHED
Object Munn v. Illinois E330549 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Munn v. Illinois | Statement: [Nebbia v. New York, relatedCase, Munn v. Illinois]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Munn v. Illinois
Context triple: [Nebbia v. New York, relatedCase, Munn v. Illinois]
  • A. Munn v. Illinois chosen
    Munn v. Illinois is an 1877 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld state regulation of private industries affecting the public interest, marking a key moment in the development of government regulatory power.
  • B. Moore v. Illinois
    Moore v. Illinois is a United States Supreme Court decision addressing constitutional criminal procedure issues, particularly concerning the rights of defendants in state prosecutions.
  • C. Bradwell v. Illinois
    Bradwell v. Illinois is an 1873 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld a state's right to bar women from practicing law, marking an early setback for women's rights under the Fourteenth Amendment.
  • D. Brown v. Illinois
    Brown v. Illinois is a 1975 U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited the admissibility of confessions obtained after an unlawful arrest by emphasizing the need to purge the taint of the initial Fourth Amendment violation.
  • E. McDonald v. City of Chicago
    McDonald v. City of Chicago is a 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms applies to state and local governments through the Fourteenth Amendment.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6ab2eaeb881909f7914758f859413 completed April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d9039107e48190ae4c4efd6257dd3c completed April 10, 2026, 2:05 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69f4598d62a8819087f83912d1e45b27 completed May 1, 2026, 7:43 a.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:46 p.m.