Triple

T11974069
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Nebbia v. New York E284993 entity
Predicate fullCaseName P3131 FINISHED
Object Leo Nebbia v. People of the State of New York E284993 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Leo Nebbia v. People of the State of New York | Statement: [Nebbia v. New York, fullCaseName, Leo Nebbia v. People of the State of New York]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Leo Nebbia v. People of the State of New York
Context triple: [Nebbia v. New York, fullCaseName, Leo Nebbia v. People of the State of New York]
  • A. Nebbia v. New York chosen
    Nebbia v. New York is a 1934 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld state regulation of milk prices and marked a major retreat from the Lochner-era limits on economic regulation under the Due Process Clause.
  • B. New York Central Railroad Co. v. Winfield
    New York Central Railroad Co. v. Winfield is a 1917 U.S. Supreme Court decision that clarified the scope of federal authority over railroad worker injury claims under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, limiting the application of state workers’ compensation laws in such cases.
  • C. Apprendi v. New Jersey
    Apprendi v. New Jersey is a landmark 2000 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that any fact (other than a prior conviction) that increases a criminal defendant’s sentence beyond the statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • D. Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri
    Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri is a 2011 U.S. Supreme Court case that held public employees’ lawsuits and grievances are protected by the Petition Clause only when they address matters of public concern.
  • E. New York v. United States (1992)
    New York v. United States (1992) is a landmark Supreme Court case that limited federal power by holding that Congress cannot compel states to enact or enforce federal regulatory programs, reinforcing the Tenth Amendment’s anti-commandeering principle.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6ab2eaeb881909f7914758f859413 completed April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d9039107e48190ae4c4efd6257dd3c completed April 10, 2026, 2:05 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69f4598d62a8819087f83912d1e45b27 completed May 1, 2026, 7:43 a.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:46 p.m.