Triple

T11647683
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Cooley v. Board of Wardens E276816 entity
Predicate hasFullName P16 FINISHED
Object Cooley v. Board of Wardens of the Port of Philadelphia E276816 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Cooley v. Board of Wardens of the Port of Philadelphia | Statement: [Cooley v. Board of Wardens, hasFullName, Cooley v. Board of Wardens of the Port of Philadelphia]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Cooley v. Board of Wardens of the Port of Philadelphia
Context triple: [Cooley v. Board of Wardens, hasFullName, Cooley v. Board of Wardens of the Port of Philadelphia]
  • A. Cooley v. Board of Wardens chosen
    Cooley v. Board of Wardens is an 1852 U.S. Supreme Court decision that helped define the scope of the Commerce Clause by allowing states to regulate certain local aspects of commerce, such as port pilotage, without violating federal authority.
  • B. Fulton v. City of Philadelphia
    Fulton v. City of Philadelphia is a 2021 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court unanimously ruled that Philadelphia violated a Catholic foster care agency’s religious freedom by excluding it from the foster program over its refusal to certify same-sex couples.
  • C. Bolling v. Sharpe
    Bolling v. Sharpe is a 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racial segregation in Washington, D.C. public schools unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
  • D. Yick Wo v. Hopkins
    Yick Wo v. Hopkins is an 1886 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racially discriminatory enforcement of a facially neutral law violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
  • E. Murdock v. Pennsylvania
    Murdock v. Pennsylvania is a 1943 U.S. Supreme Court case that held it unconstitutional to impose a license tax on the distribution of religious literature, reinforcing First Amendment protections for religious proselytizing.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aafbb3c081908a9cdb4ecb8d981d completed April 8, 2026, 7:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d8a2cd9bb0819093d107204bed2fe0 completed April 10, 2026, 7:12 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69ee87f903c48190b9055ad4cfebb1e1 completed April 26, 2026, 9:47 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:39 p.m.