Triple

T11327623
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Julie d’Étanges E268261 entity
Predicate readerReceptionRole P95128 FINISHED
Object model of sensibility for 18th-century readers LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: model of sensibility for 18th-century readers | Statement: [Julie d’Étanges, readerReceptionRole, model of sensibility for 18th-century readers]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: readerReceptionRole
Context triple: [Julie d’Étanges, readerReceptionRole, model of sensibility for 18th-century readers]
  • A. readerReception chosen
    Indicates how readers interpret, respond to, or are affected by a particular text or work.
  • B. audienceRole
    Indicates the role or function an entity has as part of an audience in relation to another entity or event.
  • C. readership
    Indicates the relationship in which one party reads, follows, or is the audience for the written or published work of another.
  • D. roleInReception
    Indicates the specific function or capacity an entity serves within the context of a reception event.
  • E. speakerRole
    Indicates the functional role or capacity in which an entity is acting as a speaker within a communicative event.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aacb1f0881908c84a349fd1be047 completed April 8, 2026, 7:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d7e9e2253881909518cad0f12ef612 completed April 9, 2026, 6:03 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d787afe5a48190b8af1a3e19529641 completed April 9, 2026, 11:04 a.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:32 p.m.