Triple
T11323093
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019 |
E268139
|
entity |
| Predicate | linkedConstitutionalProvision |
P37717
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Article 370 of the Constitution of India |
E232338
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Article 370 of the Constitution of India | Statement: [Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019, linkedConstitutionalProvision, Article 370 of the Constitution of India]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Article 370 of the Constitution of India Context triple: [Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019, linkedConstitutionalProvision, Article 370 of the Constitution of India]
-
A.
Article 370 of the Constitution of India
chosen
Article 370 of the Constitution of India was a now-abrogated provision that granted special autonomous status to the former state of Jammu and Kashmir, making it central to the region’s political and constitutional dispute.
-
B.
Article 371J of the Constitution of India
Article 371J of the Constitution of India is a special provision granting regional safeguards and development-focused measures for the Hyderabad-Karnataka (now Kalyana Karnataka) region within the state of Karnataka.
-
C.
Article 35A of the Constitution of India
Article 35A of the Constitution of India was a now-abrogated provision that empowered the Jammu and Kashmir legislature to define “permanent residents” and grant them special rights and privileges, making it a central legal issue in the Kashmir conflict.
-
D.
Part IX of the Constitution of India
Part IX of the Constitution of India is the constitutional framework that establishes and governs the system of Panchayati Raj institutions as units of local self-government in rural India.
-
E.
Article 54 of the Constitution of India
Article 54 of the Constitution of India lays down the provisions for the election of the President of India, including the composition of the electoral college responsible for choosing the President.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: linkedConstitutionalProvision Context triple: [Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019, linkedConstitutionalProvision, Article 370 of the Constitution of India]
-
A.
associatedWithConstitutionalProvision
Indicates that something has a connection or relevance to a specific constitutional provision, such as being based on, derived from, or governed by that provision.
-
B.
citesConstitutionalProvision
Indicates that one legal document, decision, or argument explicitly references and relies on a specific provision of a constitution.
-
C.
commissionConstitutionalArticle
Indicates that a commission is established, defined, or empowered by a specific article of a constitution.
-
D.
constitutionalArticleMention
chosen
Indicates that a specific constitutional article is referenced or cited in relation to another entity or context.
-
E.
constitutionalText
Indicates that one entity is the textual content that constitutes or forms part of a constitution associated with another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aaca5c24819083db46a30d86cb34 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d7e9e122e48190b3f890de8d561480 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 6:03 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69e525ed950081908ec94cfbf8849e85 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 6:58 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d787ad575081908274280bf75d95fd |
completed | April 9, 2026, 11:04 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:32 p.m.