Triple
T11311150
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | behavioral economics |
E267835
|
entity |
| Predicate | critiques |
P170
|
FINISHED |
| Object | expected utility theory |
E11182
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: expected utility theory | Statement: [behavioral economics, critiques, expected utility theory]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: expected utility theory Context triple: [behavioral economics, critiques, expected utility theory]
-
A.
expected utility theory (with John von Neumann)
chosen
Expected utility theory (with John von Neumann) is a foundational framework in economics and decision theory that models how rational agents make choices under uncertainty by maximizing the expected value of a utility function.
-
B.
prospect theory
Prospect theory is a behavioral economic framework that explains how people actually make decisions under risk and uncertainty, highlighting systematic deviations from the predictions of classical expected utility theory.
-
C.
decision theory
Decision theory is a field that studies how individuals and agents should make choices under conditions of uncertainty, weighing probabilities, outcomes, and preferences to determine optimal decisions.
-
D.
Allais paradox
The Allais paradox is a famous decision-making puzzle in behavioral economics that shows how people's choices under risk often violate the expected utility theory, revealing systematic inconsistencies in rational choice models.
-
E.
Ellsberg paradox
The Ellsberg paradox is a famous problem in decision theory and economics that demonstrates how people’s choices often violate expected utility theory due to ambiguity aversion.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aaca5c24819083db46a30d86cb34 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d7e9c0b3b88190ac0e3d6a5ad3b9bc |
completed | April 9, 2026, 6:02 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69e50a7fc06881909afe85a600d25ff2 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 5:01 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:32 p.m.