Triple

T11161912
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Ann Hopkins E264056 entity
Predicate notableFor P22 FINISHED
Object Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins E31057 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins | Statement: [Ann Hopkins, notableFor, Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins
Context triple: [Ann Hopkins, notableFor, Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins]
  • A. Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins chosen
    Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court case that established that employment decisions based on gender stereotyping violate federal anti-discrimination law and clarified the burden-shifting framework for mixed-motive discrimination claims.
  • B. Hanna v. Plumer
    Hanna v. Plumer is a 1965 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the application of the Erie doctrine by holding that valid Federal Rules of Civil Procedure govern over conflicting state procedural laws in federal diversity actions.
  • C. Henry v. Hodges
    Henry v. Hodges is a federal court case challenging state bans on same-sex marriage, decided alongside other landmark marriage equality cases prior to Obergefell v. Hodges.
  • D. Ogden v. Saunders
    Ogden v. Saunders is an 1827 U.S. Supreme Court case, known for Justice Bushrod Washington’s opinion addressing the constitutionality of state bankruptcy laws under the Contract Clause.
  • E. Lucas v. Earl
    Lucas v. Earl is a landmark 1930 U.S. Supreme Court tax law case that established the principle that income is taxed to the person who earns it, regardless of contractual arrangements to split or assign that income.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aa9ccddc8190868998c8b7beb060 completed April 8, 2026, 7:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d7e8832fe88190a74d81f9ed547baa completed April 9, 2026, 5:57 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69e46375c61c8190939401f790cf1593 completed April 19, 2026, 5:09 a.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:29 p.m.