Triple

T10920884
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Austro-Tai hypothesis E257941 entity
Predicate literatureType P96658 FINISHED
Object specialist linguistic literature LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: specialist linguistic literature | Statement: [Austro-Tai hypothesis, literatureType, specialist linguistic literature]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: literatureType
Context triple: [Austro-Tai hypothesis, literatureType, specialist linguistic literature]
  • A. inLiterature
    Indicates that a work, concept, or entity is mentioned, discussed, or represented within a piece of literature.
  • B. literaryGenreOfWork
    Indicates that a work belongs to or is classified under a particular literary genre.
  • C. literaryGenreOfSourceWork
    Indicates that a work belongs to, or is characterized by, a particular literary genre.
  • D. literarySubject
    Indicates that one entity serves as the subject, topic, or focus of a literary work created by another entity.
  • E. literaryCollection
    Indicates that one entity is a collection or compilation of literary works that includes or is associated with the other entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aa864ed88190818280ab6791d065 completed April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d77082a1488190850a4409339c3e1e completed April 9, 2026, 9:25 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d72e799f808190b6ab64fc7586a303 completed April 9, 2026, 4:43 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69d7322370648190ba14cdd6fb4cdcb0 completed April 9, 2026, 4:59 a.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:22 p.m.