Triple
T1089697
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Supreme Court of India |
E24132
|
entity |
| Predicate | powerOfJudicialReview |
P16371
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Supreme Court of India, powerOfJudicialReview, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: powerOfJudicialReview Context triple: [Supreme Court of India, powerOfJudicialReview, yes]
-
A.
judicialReviewBy
Indicates that a judicial body examines and evaluates the legality or constitutionality of an action, decision, or rule made by another authority.
-
B.
constitutionalPower
Indicates that an entity holds authority or rights granted and defined by a constitution in relation to another entity or domain of action.
-
C.
constitutionalPowersExercisedBy
chosen
Indicates that certain powers or authorities defined by a constitution are carried out or exercised by a specified actor or institution.
-
D.
constitutionalHierarchy
Indicates that one entity holds a superior or subordinate status to another within a formal constitutional or foundational legal framework.
-
E.
judicialArticle
Indicates that there is a specific legal or judicial article that governs, defines, or is applied to the relationship or action between the entities.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a49404428c819092dcc9632f5f7b8b |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:31 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4b97f216881909e9b8943ce2078e4 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:11 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4b741b0cc8190be001a16a81f6d9e |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:01 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:42 p.m.