Triple

T1056989
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Euclidean space E22816 entity
Predicate hasStandardBasis P24320 FINISHED
Object canonical basis of R^n LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: canonical basis of R^n | Statement: [Euclidean space, hasStandardBasis, canonical basis of R^n]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasStandardBasis
Context triple: [Euclidean space, hasStandardBasis, canonical basis of R^n]
  • A. hasStandardizedDimensions
    Indicates that an entity conforms to a predefined, uniform set of measurements or size specifications.
  • B. hasNonStandardForm
    Indicates that an entity possesses a form, variant, or representation that deviates from the standard, canonical, or commonly accepted form.
  • C. usesStandard
    Indicates that one entity adopts, follows, or operates according to a specified standard defined by another entity or reference.
  • D. hasStandardType
    Indicates that something conforms to or is categorized under a defined standard classification or type.
  • E. hasStandardVersion
    Indicates that one entity serves as the official or canonical version of another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a493dada0481909c43649f9843ea91 completed March 1, 2026, 7:30 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4ba6e35ac8190802341c31bda0e3b completed March 1, 2026, 10:15 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4b7340a048190807363f19d17a58f completed March 1, 2026, 10:01 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a4ba6d44c08190bf0ab28661ed8ca0 completed March 1, 2026, 10:15 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:42 p.m.