Triple

T10371757
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject TFEU Article 102 E244399 entity
Predicate exampleOfAbuse P36524 FINISHED
Object imposing unfair purchase or selling prices LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: imposing unfair purchase or selling prices | Statement: [TFEU Article 102, exampleOfAbuse, imposing unfair purchase or selling prices]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: exampleOfAbuse
Context triple: [TFEU Article 102, exampleOfAbuse, imposing unfair purchase or selling prices]
  • A. abusePubliclyExposed
    Indicates that one entity mistreats, exploits, or harms another entity whose sensitive information or vulnerabilities have been made publicly accessible.
  • B. typeOfAbuse chosen
    Indicates the specific kind or category of abusive behavior that one entity inflicts on another.
  • C. abusePolicy
    Indicates that one entity enforces or is governed by rules or guidelines defining unacceptable abusive behavior toward others.
  • D. periodOfAbuse
    Indicates the time span during which abusive behavior occurred or was experienced.
  • E. abuseSurvivorOf
    Indicates that one entity has previously suffered abuse perpetrated by the other entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d381b3e328819094b23b8edcd29b5a completed April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d4e97ed09c8190a3627aa7b5eea62f completed April 7, 2026, 11:24 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d4dface5508190a7b42f01ad0a19a2 completed April 7, 2026, 10:42 a.m.
Created at: April 6, 2026, 12:01 p.m.