Triple
T10259695
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Namibia Advisory Opinion (Legal Consequences for States of the Continued Presence of South Africa in Namibia) |
E240562
|
entity |
| Predicate | alsoKnownAs |
P39
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Legal Consequences for States of the Continued Presence of South Africa in Namibia (South West Africa) notwithstanding Security Council Resolution 276 (1970) |
E240562
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Legal Consequences for States of the Continued Presence of South Africa in Namibia (South West Africa) notwithstanding Security Council Resolution 276 (1970) | Statement: [Namibia Advisory Opinion (Legal Consequences for States of the Continued Presence of South Africa in Namibia), alsoKnownAs, Legal Consequences for States of the Continued Presence of South Africa in Namibia (South West Africa) notwithstanding Security Council Resolution 276 (1970)]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Legal Consequences for States of the Continued Presence of South Africa in Namibia (South West Africa) notwithstanding Security Council Resolution 276 (1970) Context triple: [Namibia Advisory Opinion (Legal Consequences for States of the Continued Presence of South Africa in Namibia), alsoKnownAs, Legal Consequences for States of the Continued Presence of South Africa in Namibia (South West Africa) notwithstanding Security Council Resolution 276 (1970)]
-
A.
Namibia Advisory Opinion (Legal Consequences for States of the Continued Presence of South Africa in Namibia)
chosen
The Namibia Advisory Opinion is a 1971 International Court of Justice ruling that declared South Africa’s continued presence in Namibia illegal and clarified the obligations of other states not to recognize or assist that situation.
-
B.
Advisory Opinion on the International Status of South-West Africa
The Advisory Opinion on the International Status of South-West Africa was a landmark 1950 decision by the Permanent Court of International Justice that clarified the legal status of the former German colony under South African administration and the continuing obligations of the League of Nations mandate system.
-
C.
International Court of Justice advisory opinion on Western Sahara (1975)
The International Court of Justice advisory opinion on Western Sahara (1975) was a landmark legal ruling that concluded Western Sahara was not terra nullius at the time of Spanish colonization and affirmed the Sahrawi people's right to self-determination.
-
D.
Assembly of States Parties to the Rome Statute
The Assembly of States Parties to the Rome Statute is the management and legislative oversight body of the International Criminal Court, composed of representatives of the treaty’s member states.
-
E.
South African occupation of South West Africa
The South African occupation of South West Africa was the decades-long control and administration of present-day Namibia by apartheid-era South Africa, marked by racial segregation, international disputes, and a protracted struggle for independence.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d381a7e198819090280d5ab885d59e |
completed | April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d4d24e94e08190ad2b9733bf621fe4 |
completed | April 7, 2026, 9:45 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69d6f7e9a9d48190865f047750d7bc6c |
completed | April 9, 2026, 12:50 a.m. |
Created at: April 6, 2026, 11:32 a.m.