precedentInterpreted
P8827
predicate
Indicates that one legal precedent is interpreted or understood in a particular way, often as clarified or applied in subsequent decisions or analyses.
All labels observed (5)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| subsequentCaseInterpreting | 7 |
| interpretsPrecedent | 4 |
| clarifiesPrecedent | 3 |
| precedentInterpreted canonical | 1 |
| usesPrecedent | 1 |
Description generation (PDg)
The one-sentence description above was generated by prompting gpt-5.1 with the predicate name and this instruction.
Instruction
Given a predicate that represents a relationship or action between entities, generate a one-sentence description explaining its meaning. # Instructions Focus on describing the relationship, not the entities themselves. # Response Format Begin the description with \' Indicates...\'
Input
Predicate: precedentInterpreted
Generated description
Indicates that one legal precedent is interpreted or understood in a particular way, often as clarified or applied in subsequent decisions or analyses.
Sample triples (16)
| Subject | Object |
|---|---|
| Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah | Employment Division v. Smith ⓘ |
| Fulton v. City of Philadelphia | Employment Division v. Smith via predicate surface "interpretsPrecedent" ⓘ |
| Crawford v. Washington | Davis v. Washington via predicate surface "subsequentCaseInterpreting" ⓘ |
| Crawford v. Washington | Hammon v. Indiana via predicate surface "subsequentCaseInterpreting" ⓘ |
| Crawford v. Washington | Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts via predicate surface "subsequentCaseInterpreting" ⓘ |
| Crawford v. Washington | Bullcoming v. New Mexico via predicate surface "subsequentCaseInterpreting" ⓘ |
| Crawford v. Washington | Michigan v. Bryant via predicate surface "subsequentCaseInterpreting" ⓘ |
| Crawford v. Washington | Giles v. California via predicate surface "subsequentCaseInterpreting" ⓘ |
| Crawford v. Washington | Ohio v. Clark via predicate surface "subsequentCaseInterpreting" ⓘ |
| Ukraine (as third party in other disputes citing DS512) | panel reasoning in DS512 via predicate surface "usesPrecedent" ⓘ |
| New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen | District of Columbia v. Heller via predicate surface "clarifiesPrecedent" NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen | McDonald v. City of Chicago via predicate surface "clarifiesPrecedent" NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| Hall v. Florida | Atkins v. Virginia via predicate surface "clarifiesPrecedent" NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| Gonzales v. Carhart | Planned Parenthood v. Casey via predicate surface "interpretsPrecedent" NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| Gonzales v. Carhart | Roe v. Wade via predicate surface "interpretsPrecedent" NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| Gonzales v. Carhart | Stenberg v. Carhart via predicate surface "interpretsPrecedent" NERFINISHED ⓘ |