standardOfProof
P6737
predicate
Indicates the level or degree of certainty required to establish that a claim or allegation is true in a given context.
All labels observed (12)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| standardOfProof canonical | 32 |
| usesStandardOfProof | 13 |
| appliesStandardOfProof | 5 |
| burdenOfPersuasion | 1 |
| plaintiffBurden | 1 |
| plaintiffBurdenStandard | 1 |
| standardOfProofCivil | 1 |
| standardOfProofCompared | 1 |
| standardOfProofCriminal | 1 |
| standardOfProofEstablished | 1 |
| standardOfProofUsed | 1 |
| statedCriterionForConviction | 1 |
Description generation (PDg)
The one-sentence description above was generated by prompting gpt-5.1 with the predicate name and this instruction.
Instruction
Given a predicate that represents a relationship or action between entities, generate a one-sentence description explaining its meaning. # Instructions Focus on describing the relationship, not the entities themselves. # Response Format Begin the description with \' Indicates...\'
Input
Predicate: standardOfProof
Generated description
Indicates the level or degree of certainty required to establish that a claim or allegation is true in a given context.
Sample triples (59)
| Subject | Object |
|---|---|
| Iowa Small Claims Courts | preponderance of the evidence ⓘ |
| Coroner's Court of Western Australia | balance of probabilities ⓘ |
| Evidence Code § 702 | sufficient evidence to sustain a finding that the witness has personal knowledge ⓘ |
| Evidence Code § 1271 | preponderance of the evidence ⓘ |
| District Court | beyond a reasonable doubt in criminal cases via predicate surface "appliesStandardOfProof" ⓘ |
| District Court | preponderance of the evidence in civil cases via predicate surface "appliesStandardOfProof" ⓘ |
| R v Oakes | demonstrably justified ⓘ |
| Radiation Exposure Compensation Act | liberal, non-adversarial claims process ⓘ |
| In re Winship | beyond a reasonable doubt via predicate surface "standardOfProofEstablished" ⓘ |