Triple
T37884483
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | In re Winship |
E944959
|
entity |
| Predicate | standardOfProofEstablished |
P6737
|
FINISHED |
| Object | beyond a reasonable doubt |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: beyond a reasonable doubt | Statement: [In re Winship, standardOfProofEstablished, beyond a reasonable doubt]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: standardOfProofEstablished Context triple: [In re Winship, standardOfProofEstablished, beyond a reasonable doubt]
-
A.
standardOfProof
chosen
Indicates the level or degree of certainty required to establish that a claim or allegation is true in a given context.
-
B.
establishedThat
Indicates that one entity has formally determined, demonstrated, or confirmed that a particular fact, condition, or relationship holds for another entity or situation.
-
C.
provedFrom
Indicates that one statement, theorem, or conclusion is logically derived and demonstrated to be true based on another statement or set of premises.
-
D.
burdenOfProofOn
Indicates that the responsibility to provide evidence or justification in a dispute or claim rests with a particular party.
-
E.
presentsEvidenceTo
Indicates that one entity formally provides or shows evidence to another entity, typically to support a claim, argument, or decision.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76ef02668819089e7940c4001af5e |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd8ccbd4c88190b13aae0673b3c821 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 7:12 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd8ae2227c819089546f5c3629799e |
completed | May 8, 2026, 7:04 a.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:19 p.m.