legalPhilosophy
P20219
predicate
Indicates the philosophical principles, theories, or viewpoints that underpin or guide a legal system, doctrine, or interpretation.
Aliases (1)
- legalPhilosophyExpressed ×2
Sample triples (19)
| Subject | Object |
|---|---|
| Arthur J. Goldberg | support for broad interpretation of individual rights → |
| Clarence Thomas | originalism → |
| Clarence Thomas | textualism → |
| Horace Rumpole | defence of the underdog → |
| Horace Rumpole | presumption of innocence → |
| James C. McReynolds | laissez-faire constitutionalism → |
| James Iredell Sr. | support for strong but limited federal judiciary → |
| John G. Roberts Jr. | judicial minimalism (often associated) → |
| Kenesaw Mountain Landis | judicial activism in antitrust cases → |
| Korematsu v. United States (dissent) | skepticism of unchecked executive and military power ("legalPhilosophyExpressed") → |
| Korematsu v. United States (dissent) | strong protection of individual rights against group-based punishment ("legalPhilosophyExpressed") → |
| Louis D. Brandeis | judicial restraint → |
| Louis D. Brandeis | progressive reform → |
| Louis D. Brandeis | states as laboratories of democracy → |
| Samuel Nelson | judicial restraint → |
| Sir Edward Coke | advocacy of limits on royal authority → |
| Stephen G. Breyer | pragmatism → |
| William Johnson | judicial independence → |
| William Johnson | strong federal authority → |