positionInCase
P19861
predicate
Indicates the specific role, status, or placement that an entity holds within a particular case or legal proceeding.
All labels observed (4)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| positionInCase canonical | 13 |
| notableCasePosition | 4 |
| plaintiffPosition | 1 |
| positionOnCase | 1 |
Description generation (PDg)
The one-sentence description above was generated by prompting gpt-5.1 with the predicate name and this instruction.
Instruction
Given a predicate that represents a relationship or action between entities, generate a one-sentence description explaining its meaning. # Instructions Focus on describing the relationship, not the entities themselves. # Response Format Begin the description with \' Indicates...\'
Input
Predicate: positionInCase
Generated description
Indicates the specific role, status, or placement that an entity holds within a particular case or legal proceeding.
Sample triples (19)
| Subject | Object |
|---|---|
| Roscoe C. Filburn | challenged federal production quotas ⓘ |
| Pierce Butler | voted to strike down parts of the New Deal in Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States via predicate surface "notableCasePosition" ⓘ |
| Pierce Butler | voted with the majority in Buck v. Bell via predicate surface "notableCasePosition" ⓘ |
| Pierce Butler | dissented in Near v. Minnesota via predicate surface "notableCasePosition" ⓘ |
| Pierce Butler | dissented in Olmstead v. United States via predicate surface "notableCasePosition" ⓘ |
| Korematsu v. United States (dissent) | dissent ⓘ |
| Chisholm v. Georgia | A state is subject to federal judicial power in suits by citizens of other states under Article III via predicate surface "plaintiffPosition" ⓘ |
| dissenting opinion in Miranda v. Arizona | dissent ⓘ |
| Witsell | defending South Carolina’s fishing license scheme ⓘ |
| Muller v. Oregon brief | supported upholding the Oregon maximum-hours law via predicate surface "positionOnCase" ⓘ |
| Doe | argued that the school district’s policy violated the Establishment Clause ⓘ |
| Bruun | challenged determination of taxable income ⓘ |
| Morgan | supported upholding Section 4(e) of the Voting Rights Act ⓘ |
| Patrick Hamacher | petitioner ⓘ |
|
Scott Sullivan cooperated with prosecutors
surface form:
Scott Sullivan
|
central figure in exposing WorldCom accounting fraud ⓘ |
| Matthew N. Fraser | student disciplined for speech ⓘ |
| Blair | defended authority of political party to require loyalty pledge ⓘ |
| Yakus | petitioner ⓘ |
| John McMillian | plaintiff ⓘ |