Four-source hypothesis

E943357

The Four-source hypothesis is a scholarly theory about the origins of the Synoptic Gospels that proposes Matthew and Luke drew on four distinct sources, including Mark and a lost sayings source called Q.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Statements Referenced by

Statements (49)

Predicate Object
instanceOf New Testament hypothesis
biblical studies theory
source criticism theory
synoptic problem hypothesis
addresses synoptic problem
assumes Markan priority
existence of Q
lost written sources behind Matthew and Luke
claims Luke used L as a unique source NERFINISHED
Luke used Mark as a source NERFINISHED
Luke used Q as a source NERFINISHED
Matthew used M as a unique source
Matthew used Mark as a source
Matthew used Q as a source NERFINISHED
classifiesSource L as special Lukan source
M as special Matthean source
Mark as narrative source
Q as sayings source
concerns Gospel of Luke NERFINISHED
Gospel of Mark NERFINISHED
Gospel of Matthew NERFINISHED
Synoptic Gospels NERFINISHED
contrastsWith Augustinian hypothesis NERFINISHED
Farrer hypothesis NERFINISHED
Griesbach hypothesis
dateOfFormulation late 19th century
developedFrom Two-source hypothesis NERFINISHED
explains double tradition material
special Lukan material
special Matthean material
triple tradition material
hasComponent L source
M source
Markan source NERFINISHED
Q source NERFINISHED
includesSource Gospel of Mark GENERATED
L source GENERATED
M source GENERATED
Q source GENERATED
involvesConcept literary dependence
lost gospel sources
oral tradition
redaction
proposesNumberOfSources 4
usedInDiscipline New Testament studies NERFINISHED
historical Jesus research
usedInMethod form criticism
source criticism
usedToExplain literary relationships among Synoptic Gospels

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Markan priority hypothesis oftenCombinedWith Four-source hypothesis