Matthew used Mark as a written source

E942018

claim in biblical studies hypothesis implication of Markan priority

Matthew used Mark as a written source is a key implication of the Markan priority hypothesis, which holds that the Gospel of Mark was the earliest written gospel and served as a primary source for the authors of later synoptic gospels.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Surface forms Statements Referenced by

Observed surface forms (1)

Surface form	Occurrences
The Gospel of Mark served as a primary source for the Gospels of Matthew and Luke	1

Statements (48)

Predicate	Object
instanceOf	claim in biblical studies ⓘ hypothesis ⓘ implication of Markan priority ⓘ
appliesTo	Gospel of Mark NERFINISHED ⓘ Gospel of Matthew NERFINISHED ⓘ
assumes	existence of written Gospel of Mark before composition of Matthew ⓘ literary rather than purely oral dependence ⓘ
basisOf	modern synoptic gospel source criticism ⓘ
concerns	synoptic problem ⓘ
concernsGenre	canonical gospel ⓘ
contrastsWith	Griesbach hypothesis NERFINISHED ⓘ Matthean priority ⓘ
describesRelationshipBetween	Gospel of Matthew and Gospel of Mark ⓘ
discussedIn	introductions to the New Testament ⓘ synoptic gospel commentaries ⓘ
evaluatedBy	form criticism ⓘ historical‑critical method ⓘ redaction criticism ⓘ source criticism ⓘ
field	New Testament studies ⓘ biblical scholarship ⓘ
hasComponent	shared pericopes between Matthew and Mark ⓘ use of Markan narrative framework in Matthew ⓘ verbal parallels between Matthew and Mark ⓘ
hasConsequence	Mark considered earliest written gospel ⓘ Matthew viewed as redaction of Mark plus other sources ⓘ distinction between Markan material and non‑Markan material in Matthew ⓘ
hasDebate	extent of Matthew’s dependence on Mark ⓘ whether Matthew also used Q or other sources ⓘ
hasStatus	widely accepted among critical scholars ⓘ
implies	Gospel of Mark predates Gospel of Matthew NERFINISHED ⓘ Markan priority ⓘ literary dependence of Matthew on Mark ⓘ
influences	dating of synoptic gospels ⓘ reconstructions of the historical Jesus ⓘ understanding of early Christian communities ⓘ
involves	comparison of synoptic parallels ⓘ redaction criticism of Matthew ⓘ
languageContext	Koine Greek texts ⓘ
predicateOf	Markan priority hypothesis NERFINISHED ⓘ
relatedTo	Q source hypothesis NERFINISHED ⓘ two‑source hypothesis ⓘ
supportedBy	Markan harder readings preserved in Matthew ⓘ Markan rougher style compared to Matthew ⓘ omission of Markan material in Matthew considered secondary ⓘ overlapping Greek wording in parallel passages ⓘ similar order of events in Matthew and Mark ⓘ
timePeriodDiscussed	1st century CE Christian literature ⓘ

Referenced by (3)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Markan priority → implies → Matthew used Mark as a written source ⓘ

Markan priority hypothesis → coreClaim → Matthew used Mark as a written source ⓘ

this entity surface form: The Gospel of Mark served as a primary source for the Gospels of Matthew and Luke

Markan priority hypothesis → implies → Matthew used Mark as a written source ⓘ