Southern Pacific Co. v. Jensen

E934450

Southern Pacific Co. v. Jensen is a 1917 U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited state authority over maritime workers’ compensation by holding that state laws could not interfere with the uniformity of federal admiralty and maritime law.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Statements Referenced by

Statements (36)

Predicate Object
instanceOf United States Supreme Court case
admiralty law case
federal preemption case
maritime law case
affects division of regulatory power between federal and state governments in maritime matters
appliesDoctrine federal preemption of conflicting state law
federal supremacy clause
uniformity principle in maritime law
concerns application of a state workers’ compensation statute to maritime employment
compensation for injuries to a maritime worker
hasArea United States maritime commerce
hasCitation 244 U.S. 205
hasConstitutionalBasis Article III admiralty and maritime jurisdiction
Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution NERFINISHED
hasCourt Supreme Court of the United States NERFINISHED
hasDateDecided May 21, 1917
hasImpact narrowed the application of state workers’ compensation schemes to maritime employees
reinforced federal control over maritime tort and compensation law
hasJurisdiction United States federal jurisdiction
hasLegalDomain admiralty and maritime law
workers’ compensation law
hasLegalIssue federal supremacy in admiralty and maritime law
scope of state authority over maritime workers’ compensation
uniformity of federal maritime law
hasPetitioner Southern Pacific Company NERFINISHED
hasRespondent Jensen NERFINISHED
hasYearDecided 1917
holds state laws may not interfere with the proper harmony and uniformity of general maritime law in its international and interstate relations
state workers’ compensation laws may not materially prejudice the characteristic features of the general maritime law
influenced development of the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act
isCitedFor limits on state regulation of maritime injuries occurring on navigable waters
proposition that maritime law must remain uniform across states
isPartOf United States admiralty and maritime jurisprudence
isPrecedentIn cases addressing conflict between state workers’ compensation laws and federal maritime law
cases involving injuries on navigable waters
limits state authority to regulate maritime workers’ compensation

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.