Smith v. Jones, 123 Wn.2d 456
E759727
Smith v. Jones, 123 Wn.2d 456 is a Washington Supreme Court decision reported in the second series of the Washington Reports, commonly cited as an example of the Wn.2d citation format.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Smith v. Jones, 123 Wn.2d 456 canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T8821347 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Smith v. Jones, 123 Wn.2d 456 Context triple: [Wn.2d, citationFormatExample, Smith v. Jones, 123 Wn.2d 456]
-
A.
Blakely v. Washington
Blakely v. Washington is a landmark 2004 U.S. Supreme Court decision that applied the Apprendi rule to state sentencing guidelines, holding that any fact increasing a defendant’s sentence beyond the statutory maximum must be found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt.
-
B.
United States v. Washington
United States v. Washington is a landmark federal court case that affirmed and clarified Pacific Northwest Native American tribes’ treaty fishing rights, significantly shaping U.S. Indian law and natural resource management.
-
C.
Crawford v. Washington
Crawford v. Washington is a landmark 2004 U.S. Supreme Court decision that reshaped Confrontation Clause jurisprudence by holding that testimonial hearsay is inadmissible against a criminal defendant unless the witness is unavailable and there was a prior opportunity for cross-examination.
-
D.
Wn.2d
Wn.2d is the standard legal citation abbreviation used for the second series of published opinions of the Washington Supreme Court.
-
E.
Collin v. Smith
Collin v. Smith is a U.S. federal court case that addressed the constitutionality of local ordinances restricting a planned Nazi march in Skokie, Illinois, ultimately affirming strong First Amendment protections for offensive political speech.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Smith v. Jones, 123 Wn.2d 456 Target entity description: Smith v. Jones, 123 Wn.2d 456 is a Washington Supreme Court decision reported in the second series of the Washington Reports, commonly cited as an example of the Wn.2d citation format.
-
A.
Blakely v. Washington
Blakely v. Washington is a landmark 2004 U.S. Supreme Court decision that applied the Apprendi rule to state sentencing guidelines, holding that any fact increasing a defendant’s sentence beyond the statutory maximum must be found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt.
-
B.
United States v. Washington
United States v. Washington is a landmark federal court case that affirmed and clarified Pacific Northwest Native American tribes’ treaty fishing rights, significantly shaping U.S. Indian law and natural resource management.
-
C.
Crawford v. Washington
Crawford v. Washington is a landmark 2004 U.S. Supreme Court decision that reshaped Confrontation Clause jurisprudence by holding that testimonial hearsay is inadmissible against a criminal defendant unless the witness is unavailable and there was a prior opportunity for cross-examination.
-
D.
Wn.2d
Wn.2d is the standard legal citation abbreviation used for the second series of published opinions of the Washington Supreme Court.
-
E.
Collin v. Smith
Collin v. Smith is a U.S. federal court case that addressed the constitutionality of local ordinances restricting a planned Nazi march in Skokie, Illinois, ultimately affirming strong First Amendment protections for offensive political speech.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (15)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
Washington Supreme Court case
ⓘ
court case ⓘ judicial decision ⓘ |
| caseName | Smith v. Jones NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| citation | 123 Wn.2d 456 ⓘ |
| citationFormatExampleFor | Wn.2d citation format ⓘ |
| court | Washington Supreme Court NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| jurisdiction | Washington State NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| legalSystem | United States common law ⓘ |
| page | 456 ⓘ |
| reporter | Washington Reports, Second Series NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| reporterAbbreviation | Wn.2d ⓘ |
| reporterSeriesNumber | second series ⓘ |
| stateCourtSystem | Washington court system NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| volume | 123 ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: Smith v. Jones, 123 Wn.2d 456 Description of subject: Smith v. Jones, 123 Wn.2d 456 is a Washington Supreme Court decision reported in the second series of the Washington Reports, commonly cited as an example of the Wn.2d citation format.
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.